Which intervention is least restrictive and focuses on supervision?

The intervention that is least restrictive and focuses on supervision is constant supervision. This approach involves monitoring an individual closely without implementing more invasive or coercive methods. Constant supervision prioritizes the safety and well-being of the individual while allowing a degree of freedom and autonomy that other interventions, such as physical restraints or isolation, do not provide.

In terms of patient care, constant supervision allows healthcare providers to ensure that an individual is safe while still enabling them to engage in communication and interaction. This method is preferred when the goal is to provide oversight without infringing significantly on the individual’s rights or personal space.

While inpatient admission and physical restraints are inherently more restrictive and can limit a patient's freedom of movement and autonomy, constant supervision strikes a balance by monitoring the patient closely without resorting to such measures. Similarly, isolation protocols can be seen as restrictive since they remove patients from social interactions and other rehabilitative factors that could enhance their recovery. Therefore, constant supervision stands out as the most appropriate choice in terms of being least restrictive while ensuring the patient is adequately observed.